I think one reason for this neglect is that play appears to lack “seriousness” either in its proximal manifestations or in its adaptive value or function. Indeed, play may be engaged in much more frequently than fighting, sex, and even eating. On the surface, this seems strange, since play is common in people and, as in other species, can consume large amounts of time and energy. You will find nary a mention of play in major textbooks or current research programs. Evolutionary psychologists have largely ignored play. Instead, they focus on the role of natural selection, and particularly sexual selection, in shaping the behavior of protohominids and early humans in the millennia before the advent of literacy and agriculture. It is increasingly popular, but unfortunately, most of the “new wave” of evolutionary psychologists actually seem minimally familiar with comparative psychology and ethology (the naturalistic study of animal behavior) and often largely ignore the role of our ancient vertebrate behavioral legacy. The third is that this psychology involves modular rather than general-purpose processing mechanisms (although, in fact, the underlying neural and motivational systems often overlap).Įvolutionary Psychology has a fascinating history that is to some extent problematic, though that is not my concern here. The first is that much of human behavior is inherited from our vertebrate ancestors The second is that much of our psychology has evolved to deal with demands such as finding food and mates, protecting ourselves, and rearing offspring. Evolutionary psychology and the problem of playĮvolutionary psychology is the application of Darwinian principles to psychological and behavioral phenomena in humans. I have been studying the mysteries and origins of play for several decades and this essay reviews the progress I have witnessed. Thanks to advances in several fields, this is no longer true, though that message has difficulty being heard today. Partly this may be since the debates on the function of play have been heated and unresolved, leading to the view that its evolutionary basis is not ready or able to be studied fruitfully. Not so, writes Gordon Burghardt, the contemporary study of play finds it across the animal kingdom from birds to spiders, and help makes sense of why, for us humans, play can be spontaneous, purposeless and fun.Īlthough evolutionary approaches to understanding most areas of human and animal behavior are popular, play behavior has been largely neglected. Play is dismissed as a human projection or as functional practice for adulthood that only ‘higher” mammals are capable of.
The existence of play in non-human animals is a direct challenge to old-fashioned scientific ideas.
0 kommentar(er)
